Library
A brief curation, organized along five editorial axes. Authors and works that give vocabulary to the journal's central questions: human dignity, liberal democracy, the republic, and the limits of power.
Eje IEditorial axis
The classical frameworks for discussing civil liberty, separation of functions and the place of republican institutions.
Author
Prussian philosopher (1724–1804). One of the roots of modern republican and rights-based thought. His political programme —autonomy, dignity, peace as a task— still orders contemporary democratic conversation.
View on Wikipedia →
1795
The most famous sketch of an international order founded on republics and cosmopolitan law. Peace, Kant argues, is not established by inertia: it is built as a political and moral task.
1784
“Dare to think.” The brief essay that captured, better than any other, the modern call to intellectual autonomy against every tutelage. Essential reading for any serious discussion of freedom of conscience.
Author
French thinker (1805–1859). His analysis of American democracy opened much of the modern vocabulary on civic equality, soft despotism and associational life.
View on Wikipedia →1835–1840
An early and acute observation of the internal risks of modern democracies: the conformism of opinion, administrative tutelage and the weakening of intermediary bodies.
Author
Italian philosopher of law and politics (1909–2004). Defender of procedural democracy and rights. His work is one of the clearest syntheses of post-war democratic liberalism.
View on Wikipedia →1994
A brief, honest essay on why the distinction remains useful —when it is and when it becomes sterile— and on the place of equality as a criterion.
Author
French sociologist and political scientist (1905–1983). A tireless reader of Tocqueville and Weber. Defender of a sober view of political regimes, far from ideological enthusiasm.
View on Wikipedia →1938
Aron's doctoral thesis, in which he lays the epistemological foundations of all his later work: the limits of historical knowledge, the plurality of interpretations and the intellectual's responsibility before the judgment of time.
Author
Philosopher and historian of ideas (1909–1997). He reopened the post-war debate on liberty and showed —with rare care— why legitimate values can enter irreducible conflict with one another.
View on Wikipedia →1958
The distinction between negative liberty —freedom from interference— and positive liberty —being the effective master of one's own decisions. A brief and still central lecture for discussing the contemporary meaning of the liberal project.
Author
American political philosopher (1935). He thought of justice as plural spheres and rigorously revisited the theory of just war and the place of cultural pluralism.
View on Wikipedia →Author
Canadian philosopher (1931). A central reading for thinking modern identity, democratic secularism and the possibility of a shared public life among plural communities.
View on Wikipedia →Author
American philosopher (1817–1862), thinker of civil disobedience and of the moral conscience against the State. His brief essay gave its name to a century of non-violent resistance and still runs through the contemporary vocabulary on conscientious objection.
View on Wikipedia →1849
Why the conscience's ultimate loyalty is not to the State but to moral judgment. A brief text that inspired figures from Gandhi to Martin Luther King and that still feeds the contemporary vocabulary on conscientious objection.
Eje IIEditorial axis
Readings that help recognize the conditions by which a society can yield to fear, to the single answer or to democratic backsliding.
Author
German political philosopher (1906–1975). She thought of freedom as a public capacity and warned about the conditions that make totalitarian regimes and the banality of evil possible.
View on Wikipedia →
1951
How antisemitism, imperialism and social atomization made the totalitarian regimes of the twentieth century possible. A question that remains ours: what conditions allow a society to yield to fear.

1958
Classic distinction between labour, work and action. Politics is not the administration of things: it is the space in which people appear before one another and begin something new.
Author
Philosopher of science and politics (1902–1994). An early and consistent defender of the open society against the temptation of a single answer. His critique of historicism left its mark on much of twentieth-century democratic liberalism.
View on Wikipedia →
1945
A critique of the traditions —Plato, Hegel, Marx— that promise a definitive political truth. Freedom, Popper argues, depends on the willingness to correct oneself together. Still essential reading against any authoritarian temptation.
Author
American political scientists at Harvard. They study comparatively how contemporary democracies erode without the need for classical coups: the role of unwritten norms, the partisan capture of institutions and extreme polarization.
View on Wikipedia →
2018
An already-classic piece of contemporary democratic analysis. Why most present-day democracies do not fall by tanks but by elected rulers who erode, step by step, the norms that sustain fair play.
2023
A natural continuation of the previous book. How institutions designed to limit power can, under certain conditions, shield a political minority from majority will. A warning about the limits of constitutional design.
Author
American historian (1969), professor at Yale. He studies twentieth-century Central and Eastern Europe and writes on contemporary democratic backsliding.
View on Wikipedia →
2017
A brief manual on how democracies erode —from within— and what an ordinary citizenry can do to resist. Concise and useful far beyond the country that prompted it.
Eje IIIEditorial axis
The person as an end in themselves, the moral limit to all violence and freedom as effective capacity for a fulfilled life.
Author
French philosopher (1882–1973). One of the principal voices of twentieth-century personalist humanism. He had a decisive influence on the drafting of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
View on Wikipedia →1936
A programme of thought that places the person at the centre of political life without renouncing the communal dimension. Foundational reading for understanding contemporary democratic humanism.
Author
French essayist and novelist (1913–1960). Lucid in the face of the totalitarian temptations of the twentieth century —of one sign and the other— and a sober defender of moral rebellion against absurdity and violence.
View on Wikipedia →1942
The novel that crystallized Camus's notion of the absurd and which, without being a text of political philosophy, ordered the reader's moral conscience like few others before a world without automatic transcendence.
Author
Indian economist and philosopher (1933), Nobel Prize in Economics 1998. He rethought development as the expansion of effective capabilities, articulating political freedom and fulfilled life.
View on Wikipedia →Eje IVEditorial axis
How contemporary democracy is sustained, represented and debated —its promises, its tensions and its setbacks.
Author
German philosopher and sociologist (1929). His theory of communicative action and the public sphere is one of the most used tools for discussing democratic deliberation and legitimacy.
View on Wikipedia →1981
Habermas's major work. A theory of rational understanding as the core of social and democratic life: two volumes that articulate philosophy of language, sociology and political theory to ground deliberative democracy.
Author
American philosopher (1921–2002). He reformulated the central questions of contemporary political philosophy: what makes the institutions of a free society just.
View on Wikipedia →1971
The two principles of justice, the original position, the veil of ignorance. A conceptual architecture that articulated contemporary egalitarian liberalism and still orders the debate.
Author
Polish-American political scientist (1940). One of the most rigorous voices in the empirical study of democracies: why they are born, how they are sustained and what makes them recede.
View on Wikipedia →2019
A long-range look at the symptoms of democratic backsliding in the West. Democracies do not always fall by coups: sometimes they empty out slowly, while one watches.
Author
French historian and political scientist (1948). He studies the contemporary transformations of representation, legitimacy and democratic distrust.
View on Wikipedia →2006
How other forms of citizen action —oversight, denunciation, judgment— coexist with the vote, and can either correct electoral democracy or, ill used, weaken it.
Author
British sociologist (1938), former director of the London School of Economics. He thought of late modernity as a horizon of risk, self-organization and growing reflexivity —and, with it, the challenges that globalization poses to contemporary democracies.
View on Wikipedia →1990
On the institutions that produced a world simultaneously freer and more exposed to risk —the nation-state, the global market, science. A key piece for thinking globalization carefully.
1991
How personal identity becomes a reflexive project in societies where traditional certainties dissolve. Useful reading for discussing the link between intimate life, freedom and civic bond.
Author
Italian political philosopher (1950–), professor at the University of Bologna. A critic of the “fluidity” of power in contemporary democracy and author of works on sovereignty, political space and a critique of post-Fordist liberalism.
View on Wikipedia →2011
Why contemporary democracy feels, simultaneously, the pull of populism and the exhaustion of its representative institutions. An Italian reading of the tensions of the democratic project in the twenty-first century.
Author
Italian judge and jurist (1946–), known for the “Mani Pulite” investigations into political corruption. A writer of democratic outreach and a critic of the culture of impunity: one of the most level-headed Italian voices defending the common sense of the rule of law.
View on Wikipedia →2011
An elementary and serene defence of democracy as a form of common life, written from the experience of a judge who saw the corruption of institutions up close. A reading at once accessible and demanding.
Eje VEditorial axis
How rule-based international orders, grounded in liberal democracies, are built, sustained and eroded. Essential reading for understanding the place of democracy in world politics.
Author
American political scientist (1954), professor at Princeton. One of the central voices of contemporary liberal internationalism: how rule-based international orders, grounded in institutions and liberal democracies, are built, sustained and eroded.
View on Wikipedia →2001
How the victorious powers of major wars build —or fail to build— international orders that bind them to themselves through institutions. A key reading for discussing the post-war international architecture and its current crisis.
2011
The liberal international order as a paradoxical Leviathan: hegemonic and at the same time bound by the rules it itself created. A foundational piece for understanding the promise and limits of liberal internationalism.
2020
A long history of liberal internationalism as a political project. Why liberal democracies have, time and again, needed an international order to protect them from one another, and why that order is once again under contest.
Author
American political scientists, leading figures of the liberal theory of international relations. They rethought power, cooperation and interdependence among States in a world more complex than the mere logic of force.
View on Wikipedia →1977
The book that reformulated the conversation on power in international relations: no longer mere military coercion, but a web of economic, institutional and social interdependencies that also constrain and orient States.
2004
Joseph Nye explains why a country's ability to make itself attractive —its culture, its democratic ideals, its institutions— is a form of power as real as its military capacity. A conceptual tool now under contest.
Eje VIEditorial axis
Local voices that bring historical, institutional and cultural body to democratic thought in the River Plate.
Author

Argentine historian and political scientist (1937). One of the most serious voices of contemporary republican thought in the River Plate. A precise reader of Tocqueville, Sarmiento and Alberdi.
View on Wikipedia →1977
The institutional construction of the Argentine regime between 1880 and 1916: how a political order was forged with legal foundations and, at the same time, with a limited horizon of citizenship. A classic piece for understanding how politics is thought in the country.
1984
A journey through Alberdi, Echeverría and Sarmiento as thinkers of an Argentine republic under construction. Useful for discussing, today, what is inherited and what is rewritten from that tradition.
Author
Argentine journalist and essayist (1934–2022). A chronicler of politics, economics and democratic backsliding in the twentieth century and the beginning of the twenty-first. A River-Plate voice for discussing barbarism without giving up democratic hope.
View on Wikipedia →2014
A series of reflections on the civilizational regressions of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries —totalitarianisms, genocides, war as horizon— and on what modern societies can still learn from those experiences in order not to repeat them.
Author

Argentine political scientist (1936–2011). One of the most rigorous voices on democratic transitions, horizontal accountability and delegative democracy. His work defined much of the contemporary vocabulary on democratization.
View on Wikipedia →1973
The classic analysis of the emergence of “bureaucratic” authoritarian regimes in Latin America as a response to the contradictions of dependent development. It established the conceptual framework for understanding Southern Cone authoritarianism.
1999
A collection that brings together the central essays on delegative democracy, horizontal accountability and the limits of the polyarchic model for Latin America.
2010
The most mature elaboration of O'Donnell's theoretical project: thinking democracy from the effectiveness of the State and the capacity for citizen agency, not only from the formal rules of the regime.
This library grows with the publication. contact.
Explore the journal